![]() ![]() ![]() In addition to examining the available APIs provided by the JVM versus. NET Compact Framework solution of comparable performance within a particular embedded design. The resources, costs, and time to implement this required functionality for the AOT/WAT-based JVM within the scope of the project.Īnother example is investigating utilizing a JIT implementation of a JVM versus going with the JIT-based. This also requires understanding any new requirements for more powerful underlying hardware in support of a different JVM implementation. The feasibility of deploying with another JVM based on a different byte code processing scheme that may run a bit slower then the faster JVM solution that lacks dynamic download and extensibility support. If an AOT- or a WAT-based JVM does not support dynamic download capabilities and on-the-field, dynamic extensibility support is a non-negotiable requirement for the embedded system being designed, then it means needing to further investigate: ![]() A JVM that utilizes some type of ahead-of-time (AOT) or WAT compilation can provide a big boost in performance when running on particular hardware, but this type of JVM may lack the ability to process dynamically downloaded Java byte code. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |